In making sense of the mayhem, one arrives at a somewhat makeshift restoration of balance and an understanding, as it were, of what led to the fissures in the first place. This holds especially true for crime fiction, as it explores societal fault lines that upend the natural order of life. It’s difficult to separate a writer from her politics. When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman - and, as I’ve said, gender confirmation certificates may now be granted without any need for surgery or hormones - then you open the door to any and all men who wish to come inside.” At the same time, I do not want to make natal girls and women less safe. After all, in an essay on June 10, she wrote - “…I want trans women to be safe. So, when news broke out about her latest book featuring a character who cross-dresses to lure vulnerable women to their painful deaths, it was seen as a further indictment of her lack of nuance. In a year that has highlighted inequalities like never before, Rowling’s controversial views on transgender rights has raked up a storm of disappointment and resentment at her purported transphobia. On Sunday, the billionaire author of "Harry Potter" mocked trans activists who use children to bash her.Even before JK Rowling’s Troubled Blood - the fifth novel in her detective series under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith - hit the stands, criticism of the book had been rife. A) Dogs bark B) This isn't barking, therefore C) This isn't a dog." What happened now? Rowling responded by exposing the absurdity of the logic. Her interlocutor claimed that "lots of women don't menstruate," citing birth control, menopause, and hysterectomies thus you cannot use menstruation as a boundary marker for women and men. Last week, Rowling once again riled up the pro-trans crowd when she responded to someone who suggested menstruation is a faulty criterion for determining what a woman is. Her opponents condemn her as a "TERF," or trans-exclusionary radical feminist. What is the background?įor years, Rowling has been attacked for believing the transgender agenda - and particularly the idea that biological men can "become women" - cheapens the value of women. Rowling went viral on Sunday for her response to critics who use their children to attack her.
0 kommentar(er)
